Phase of Venus on the 3rd January 2025

More clear weather was to be had two nights ago on the evening of the 3rd January and I was back at the telescope looking at Venus. At about 4pm Venus was now quite high in the sky at an altitude of 24 degrees and, as said in my previous post, only 3 to 4 degrees away from a 4 day old moon. It made a pretty conjunction. I again used my Celestron 102mm with a 9mm eyepiece and x2 Barlow lens. The seeing was again good and estimated to be AII on the Antoniadi scale. There was a bit of intermittent cloud. Here is the page out of my notebook:-

One new thing you will notice is that I have printed out a planetary blank (courtesy of Paul Abel) and stuck it in my notebook prior to observing. All I needed to do was shade in the dark half of the planet. I again estimated the phase by comparing what I saw at the telescope with a series of phase diagrams ranging from 50 to 60% in steps of 1%. My estimate this time was 53% and this is what this looks like when drawn on a computer:-

Looking at the data in the BAA Handbook (and interpolating) the phase was predicted to be 54.5% and so I had underestimated it by 1.5%. Here is what 55% looks like on a computer:-

There isn't a lot in it. There is a bit more curvature in the terminator and indetation at the 'poles'.

All text and images © Duncan Hale-Sutton 2025

Conjunction of the Moon and Venus (2nd January 2025)

The new year has got off well with a clearish beginning to the evening of the 2nd January. A three day old moon was now in the sky and in the same area as Venus. This made a pretty conjunction and so I got out my camera to take a picture:-

The photo was taken at 16:32 UT with my Nikon D90 set at a focal length of 50mm (1/5s at f/5, ISO 400). Some cloud was beginning to roll in as you can see and the clear sky didn't last that long! Actually, the Moon and Venus were even closer the following day, separated by perhaps 3 or 4 degrees.

All text and images © Duncan Hale-Sutton 2025

Another phase observation of Venus (29th December 2024)

Sunday night we were treated to a clear night and late in afternoon I dragged the telescope out again to have another look at the planet Venus. I had a couple of improvements to add to my observations this time and one of these was a new x2 Barlow lens made by Astro Essentials and purchased from First Light Optics. It seemed a reasonable quality lens for the price and has a T-thread which means I can attach the camera to the back of it. This will enable me to do some planetary work with my camera on my other scope (an Orion OMC-140 with a focal length of 2000mm). 

The other improvement was to have a series of diagrams of what an illuminated sphere looks like at phases of 50 through to 60% in steps of 1% (as mentioned in my previous blog entry). I uploaded these diagrams to my phone and then at the telescope I could compare them to the image of Venus. It was then a case of swiping from one to the next to try and match what I could see to what might be predicted. I think this worked quite well. Here is the page from my notebook:-

 

I started observing about 16:30 UT and finished at 17:04. The seeing was better this time and estimated to be AII (slight undulations with moments of calm lasting several seconds). Venus was in the SSW at a higher altitude of 19 degrees compared to five days ago. Note also that the magnification was now 147x leading to a much larger image.

By comparison to my phase diagrams I thought the phase was between 56 and 57% and my drawing reflects what I saw. I was still under the impression that the northern cusp was more prominent than the one in the south. The BAA handbook had the phase as 0.569 on this date in good agreement with what I saw. In actual fact the BAA lists the phase as 0.582 on the 26th December 2024 and 0.555 on the 1st January 2025 and I had to linearly interpolate.

Here is what 57% phase is supposed to look like:-

All text and images © Duncan Hale-Sutton 2025

Venus on the 24th December 2024

Further to my my previous post I had another view of Venus on Christmas Eve. The weather had been pretty overcast in the lead up to Christmas and so I was pleased to see the planet at all. In fact, I had an additional incentive to make this observation as the BAA had a challenge to observe something on Christmas Day (or alternatively, if the weather was poor, Christmas Eve or Boxing Day). As it turned out Christmas Day and Boxing Day were a wash out, so I am glad I got a clear (ish) window Christmas Eve.

Around 6pm GMT I could see Venus low down in the SW at an altitude of about 11 degrees. There was a lot of thin cloud or mist about, but that didn't matter too much as the planet was bright enough to be seen clearly. I started making another drawing of its phase about 18:04 UT and finished observing at 18:18. This time I made an estimate of the seeing which was AIII on the Antoniadi scale (AIII corresponds to moderate seeing with larger air tremors). Here is the page out of my notebook:-

 

I was again using my NexStar 102 SLT and a 9mm eyepiece. I think this has been a learning experience for me. This time I paid quite close attention to the shape of the terminator and you will see, comparing it to the drawing I made on the 14th, that the cusps of the terminator (where it meets the 'poles') are much more indented than on my earlier drawing. In fact, I made a note about this on my drawing as you can see (it seemed to me that this indented cusp was more pronounced in the north). Taking my drawing again as a measure of the phase, the terminator was found to be 17.5mm from the right edge and since I had drawn my circle to be the same 32 mm diameter as before, this meant that my phase estimate was 17.5/32 = 0.547. 

According to the BAA handbook it was predicted to be 0.590 and so this would mean I had underestimated the phase by 0.043. However, I think there has been a bit of an expectation on my part about what the shape of the illuminated half of Venus should look like. In actual fact, by paying attention to the shape of the cusps I have produced a drawing that is much more like what would be predicted for an illuminated sphere. To aid me in understanding what the predicted shape should look like I have produced a number of drawings on the computer ranging in phase from 50% to 60% in 1% intervals. Here is the one for 59%:-

I think my drawing for the 24th December is accurate in shape for the cusps but is too linear near the equator. This may have been an expectation on my part that the terminator should be closer to the 50% mark than in my drawing on the 14th. In conclusion, it seems to me that perhaps I was underestimating the phase on these two dates.

All text and images © Duncan Hale-Sutton 2025

The phase of Venus 14th December 2024

I have been wanting to get out for a week or two now and see Venus with my telescope since this planet has been more visible in the evening sky. Venus is approaching its greatest elongation east on the 10th January 2025 and it will then be at its furthest angular distance from the sun as viewed from earth. However, this is not going to be a very good apparition because the ecliptic (near to which Venus travels) is going to be low down in our sky.

One of the things I wanted to do with an observation is to estimate Venus's phase as it approaches elongation. When Venus came out of superior conjunction on the 4th June, its phase was full and ever since then its phase has been decreasing and it will reach dichotomy (half phase - equal dark and light) on January 12th 2025. On the 14th December I spotted Venus low in the SSW at an altitude of 5 to 6 degrees. Although there was a bit of intermittent thin cloud I thought it worth getting out my Celestron NexStar 102 SLT and having a look. I didn't bother with a proper set up of this computer controlled telescope but just pointed it in the right direction. Here is a page out of my notebook:-

I used a 9mm Orthoscopic eyepiece that I have owned for about 43 years to get a good view of the planet. The NexStar has a focal length of 660mm and so this gives a magnification of about 660/9 = 73. I had drawn a circle in pencil in my notebook and then at the telescope at around 17.10 UT I drew the phase as I saw it. I had no preconceived notion of what the phase would be and so my choice of shading was as I thought it should be.

I should first point out that the phase is technically the ratio of the apparent area illuminated to the total apparent area of the planet. This is not very easy to measure directly! However, provided that Venus behaves like an illuminated sphere then the phase can be determinded from measuring how far along the "equator" the terminator is and then dividing this by the apparent diameter. I will prove this at some point in another blog entry.

From my diagram the terminator was 18 mm from the right edge and the diameter was 32mm and so I estimated the phase to be 18/32 = 0.563. The predicted phase on this date from my BAA handbook was 0.631 and so the difference was 0.068. Note that with my use of a star diagonal south is at the top of my image but west is still to the right.

I don't think this was too bad. In actual fact many observers underestimate the phase of Venus in an eastern elongation and this is known as the Schröter Effect. I will try and write about this more later.

All text and images © Duncan Hale-Sutton 2024

Recent variable star observations (23rd October, 25th and 29th November)

I have been carrying on with my variable star observations (these are mostly pulsating variables). The evening of the 23rd October was one day before last quarter and the Moon wouldn't rise until 21:11 UT. Astronomical twilight ended at about 18:40 UT. The skies were clear but the transparency wasn't great.

Here are my observations:-

TX Dra, 19:25 UT, chart 106.04, S(2)V(1)K, mag.6.9

AH Dra, 19:40 UT, chart 106.04, 2(3)V(2)6, mag. 7.6

CH Cyg, 20:08 UT, chart 089.04, A(1)V(3)W, mag. 6.7

Z Uma, 20:33 UT, chart 217.02, =C, mag.7.5

On the night of the 25th November, a month later, the Moon was 2 days past last quarter and wouldn't rise until 02:21 UT. Astronomical twilight ended at about 18:00 UT. The sky transparency was average. One of the mistakes I made was to assume that it was still British Summer Time and so I recorded my observation times as an hour earlier than they should have been. Fortunately, I saw my mistake and corrected it. Here are the observations:-

CH Cyg, 18:40 UT, chart 089.04, =A, mag. 6.5

TX Dra, 19:07 UT, chart 106.04, =N, mag. 7.7

AH Dra, 19:15 UT, chart 106.04, =6, mag. 7.8

RW Cep, 22:17 UT, chart 312.02, B(1)V(3)E, mag. 6.7

W Cep, 22:23 UT, chart 312.02, D(4)V(1)F, mag. 7.4

GO Peg, 22:50 UT, chart 103.02, B(3)V(1)E, mag. 7.6

Z Uma, 23:21 UT, chart 217.02, =B, mag. 7.3

A few nights ago on the 29th November it was 2 days before new moon. Astronomical twilight ended about 18:00 UT and the sky transparency was good. Before this observing session I was looking for some new variable stars to observe to add to my roster. The ones in Cygnus below were the first of these. I also had a go at AC Herculis which I hadn't observed since 2023.

AC Her, 19:19 UT, chart 048.4, D(1)V(1)E, mag. 7.8

AF Cyg, 21:51 UT, chart 232.02, =Q, mag. 7.6

V973 Cyg, 22:02 UT, chart 232.02, =F, mag. 6.7

All seen with 10x50 binoculars.

All text and images © Duncan Hale-Sutton 2024

Update on T Corona Borealis

Whilst I was taking pictures of Comet Tsuchinshan-Atlas on the 18th October I realised that the constellation of Corona Borealis was nicely placed for observation as well. We have been waiting about a year now for the eruption of the recurrent nova T Corona Borealis (T CrB) and, as yet, it still hasn't exploded. According to Prof. Bradley E Schaefer the star was predicted to erupt about the 25th May 2024 with an upper error bound of the 12th September. This prediction was based on T CrB entering a "super active" state in 2015 and then entering the pre eruptive "Peltier dip" in the middle of 2023. The problem with predictions is that the stars themselves are fickle and we do not have a good knowledge of exactly what is happening in the processes that lead to an eruption.

I took this image of the constellation of Corona Borealis at 18:59 UT on the 18th October. This was taken with my Nikon D90 with a Nikkor VR 18-105 lens at 75mm. The main image consists of 8x5s exposures (ISO 3200) combined in Photoshop (click on the image to see it full size). This shows the bowl shape of the crown quite well and I have marked the star epsilon CrB near to which the star T CrB can be found. The blue square in the image has been expanded upon in the top left image. This is based on 16x5s exposures at ISO3200 and the contrast has been increased in Photoshop. This inset is at the full resolution of the camera. I have used the BAAVSS chart 025.04 to label some stars and indicate how bright they are in visual magnitudes (the star is always to the right of the green label). The faintest stars being picked up are just about 10th magnitude. The position of T CrB is marked but as can be seen it is only just faintly registering and must have been 10th magnitude or fainter at the time.

Along with the rest of the BAA, I have been continuing to monitor this star as often as I can. My last observation was yesterday (the 25th November 2024) and in binoculars there was still no sign that this star had erupted. At the moment the light curve for this star is still showing that it is fluctuating between 10.0 and 10.5 magnitudes. Of course, you can now find papers that are predicting later eruption dates but who knows what will happen.

All text and images © Duncan Hale-Sutton 2024