Jupiter

A few days ago on Monday the 19th September we had some very nice dark skies and I thought I would try to observe Jupiter which is approaching opposition on the 26th September. I decided to use my 5.5 inch Orion OMC-140 Maksutov-Cassegrain mounted on a Sky-Watcher HEQ-5 mount. I didn't bother to set up the drive properly so the image of the planet drifted in the eyepiece.

At about 11pm BST I began using a Celestron 25mm eyepiece which gave a magnification of 80x as the scope has a focal length of 2000mm. It was nice to see all four Galilean moons and some details on the planet surface. Rather than trying to photograph what I could see I made a drawing:-

In this picture south is up and west is to the left. The moons were nicely displayed with Io closest to Jupiter and then, with increasing distance from the planet, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto in that order. This was verified by looking at the BAA Handbook. On the planet itself the Northern Equatorial Belt (the much darker thicker line) was obvious but the detail of the southern features much less so and my impression was of three faint lines as drawn. I swapped to a 20mm Erfle lens which gave a slightly better view (x100) whilst I drew the details.

I wish I could have seen more details on the gaseous surface but I think a 5.5inch objective just isn't big enough. I did swap to a 9mm orthoscopic eyepiece that gave a magnification of x222 but this didn't improve the detail, though I did look very hard. The seeing was pretty good and there were longish periods when the image looked stable and in focus. I finished observing about 40 minutes later.

All text and images © Duncan Hale-Sutton 2022

AC Her, CH Cyg, TX and AH Dra

We had a better night for observing last Saturday, the 17th September, when the sky cleared in the earlier part of the evening. Drifting light cloud was still a bit of an issue but not as much as on the 5th. Twilight ended just after 9pm BST when I started observing and the moon wasn't due to rise until 10:11pm BST it being at last quarter.

It was earlier enough that I could get a decent observation of AC Herculis before it began to head over to the west. At 19:52 UT I could make out star E on chart 048.04 and so my limiting magnitude was fainter than 8.2. At 20:09 UT I estimated that AC was about equal in brightness to star D which made it magnitude 7.4.

I then went on to look at CH Cygni which lies in the wingtip of Cygnus the swan and overhead at this time of the year. At 20:29 UT I estimated that CH was about equal in brightness to star A on chart 089.04 (pdf) which made it magnitude 6.5. I think my estimate may have been 0.2 to 0.3 magnitudes brighter than other BAA observers who saw this star on the same night.

I moved round to the other side of the house to have another go at TX and AH Draconis. At 21:11 UT I thought that TX was brighter than star N (mag. 7.7) on chart 106.03 but only somewhat fainter than star K (mag. 7.0). So my estimate was that it was 2 "points" from N and one from K making it magnitude 7.2.

Finally, at 21:28 I estimated that AH Dra was about midway in brightness between star 1 (mag. 7.1) on chart the same chart and star 6 (mag. 7.8) making it magnitude 7.5.

All text and images © Duncan Hale-Sutton 2022

TX and AH Draconis

It has been a difficult time to get any observing done recently what with the cloudy skies we have been experiencing of late. I tried a couple of times on the 19th and 31st August to do some variable star observing but cloud just kept getting in the way. I had some more success over a week ago on the 5th September and was able to get observations made of TX and AH Draconis. At the time when I was observing, the moon was 2 days past first quarter but low in the sky to the south. There was a little bit of light cloud but this didn't really make an impact until after 11pm BST. There is no problem with twilight now after 10pm BST when I started observing. These stars in the constellation of Draco aren't far from the star Eta Draconis which was still high in the sky to the west.

At 21:38 UT I could make out star P on BAA chart 106.03 with my 7x50 bins. This meant that my limiting magnitude was fainter than 8.4. At 21:46 I estimated that TX was marginally brighter than the star N (=7.7 mag.) on the chart but fainter than K (=7.0 mag.). So my estimate was K(2)V(1)N (one "point" from N but two "points" from K) which made it magnitude 7.5 to one decimal place.

Moving on to AH Dra I observed at 22:01 UT that this star was brighter than star 8 (=8.4 mag.) on the chart but fainter than star 1 (=7.1 mag.). In fact, it was much closer in brightness to 8 than it was to 1, so my estimate was 1(3)V(1)8 which made it magnitude 8.1 (to 1 d.p.).

This last observation was a bit rushed as I could see a bank of cloud moving in from the south which would end my night. However, I don't think either of these observations are in too much disagreement with other observers from the BAA.

All text and images © Duncan Hale-Sutton 2022

The Perseid Meteor shower 2022

At the weekend we had the maximum of the Perseid Meteor shower. The maximum was supposed to have occurred on the morning of Saturday 13th August but we didn't really have good clear skies until Sunday night. The moon at this time was only 2 days past full and so it was going to interfere with seeing the fainter meteors. I didn't do an official count but just went out to see what I could see. I was surprised to see quite a number (perhaps 10) over about an hour from about 11pm (BST). I also saw a few others which were either sporadics or other shower members. I think it helped that the moon was still rising at this time. I sat facing north east and perhaps the best meteors I saw passed through Ursa Major low over our house. There were three similar meteors that were pretty bright in this area with long trails. I suspect that they were all brighter than Jupiter (currently -2.7).

All text and images © Duncan Hale-Sutton 2022

TX and AH Draconis

Over a week ago on the 7th August we had some clear skies and with the moon only two days past first quarter I thought I could have a go at getting an estimate of the brightness of TX and AH Dra. The moon was low in the sky in the south west at around 11pm (BST) when I went out to observe these stars. I began with TX as it is easy to find being near Eta Dra. I could, at 22:14 UT, see star P on BAA chart 106.03 which meant that my limiting magnitude with my 7x50 binoculars was fainter than 8.4. At 22:21 UT I found that TX was marginally brighter than N (=7.7 mag.) but fainter than K (=7.0 mag.). So my estimate was K(3)V(1)N which made TX magnitude 7.5 (to one decimal place). Note also that by this time astronomical twilight had ended.

Moving on to AH which is on the same chart at 22:31 I could see star 8 which again meant that my limiting magnitude was fainter than 8.4. At 22:37 I found that AH was marginally brighter than star 8 (=8.4 mag.) but fainter than star 6 (=7.8 mag.). My estimate was 6(2)V(1)8 which made it 8.2.

Both these estimates are again in good agreement with other observers from the BAA and AAVSO.

All text and images © Duncan Hale-Sutton 2022

CH Cyg, AC Her, Z and RY UMa

At this time of year we are starting to get proper dark skies again which are not affected by twilight. A week ago on the 29th July we had some clear skies up until just gone midnight and from then until about 2am (BST) twilight was absent. The moon was also only one day past new.

I was able to make some more observations of the variable stars CH Cygni, AC Herculis, Z and RY Ursae Majoris. Here is a brief summary of my observations using my 7x50 binoculars:-

• CH Cyg. 22:10 UT. Estimated to be fainter than A but brighter than W - A(1)V(3)W, mag. 6.7
• AC Her. 22:42 UT. Estimated to be fainter than C but brighter than D - C(1)V(1)D, mag. 7.2
• Z Uma.  23:14 UT. Estimated to be about the same brightness as L      - =L,        mag. 8.9
• RY UMa. 23:29 UT. Estimated to be fainter than 2 but brighter than 4 - 2(1)V(1)4, mag. 7.6
  

A little while after this the sky clouded up which seems to be the story of recent months. There doesn't appear to be any major discrepancies between my observations and those of other observers.

All text and images © Duncan Hale-Sutton 2022

TX and AH Draconis

Three days ago (the 19th July 2022) we had some brief clear weather close to midnight and I was able to observe TX and AH Dra. Initially, I did look for RY and Z UMa in Ursa Major (The Big Bear) but it is now low down in the north and there was too much atmospheric extinction and twilight at that altitude for me to be able to make a decent estimate. The moon wasn't a problem at this time as it was two days from last quarter and hadn't risen.

Beginning with TX Dra which is easier to find (being close to Eta Dra) I found that I could, with my 7x50 binoculars, see stars K (=7.0 mag.), N (=7.7 mag.) and P (=8.4 mag.) on BAA chart 106.03. This meant my limiting visual magnitude was fainter than 8.4. At 22:34 UT I estimated that TX was fainter than K but brighter than N but closer in brightness to N. So my estimate was K(2)V(1)N which made it magnitude 7.5 (to one decimal place).

Going on to AH Dra, I found that the star was fainter than the star labelled 1 (=7.1 mag.) but brighter than the star labelled 8 (=8.4 mag.) but not much brighter than 8. So my estimate was 1(3)V(1)8 which made it magnitude 8.1 (to one decimal place).

Both these estimates were in good agreement with other observers from the BAA and AAVSO.

All text and images © Duncan Hale-Sutton 2022